Seekins v. International Paper Co.

Summary:
Panel finds that HO Goodnough did not err in finding that the EE was entitled to permanent impairment benefits under the former §56-B despite the fact that the Board had previously determined that the effects of the injury had ended. The Appellate Division focused its decision on whether the injury continued to produce incapacity and failed to address the employer’s argument that the Board had twice found the effects of the work injury ended.

View complete text of Stuart Seekins v. International Paper Co.